Truck Trend Homepage
Get Adobe Flash player
01L K And N Headquarters Dyno 2009 Ford F 150

Better Breathing: More Power and Better Fuel Economy For Our 2009 Ford F-150

October, 2009
By By The Author
Photography by By The Author

1 2009 Ford F 150 V 8
1. Our '09 F-150 has Ford's... 
   
  read full caption
1 2009 Ford F 150 V 8
1. Our '09 F-150 has Ford's three-valve 5.4-liter V-8, factory rated at 310 horsepower and 365 pound-feet of torque. Much of the engine compartment is filled with the air box (bottom) and the resonator chambers on the intake tube, both of which get streamlined with the K&N Intake Kit.
If we've learned anything from recent history, it's that there aren't a lot of people interested in buying new pickups or full-size SUVs. Although that's bad news for Ford, Chevy, Toyota, and others, companies that make products to improve efficiency and fuel economy are doing quite well.

There are plenty of simple ways to improve the fuel economy of your truck, but some of the easiest have to do with improving efficiency. In fact, one of the simplest ways to improve any big V-8 is to make it a better breather. Substantial gains can be made by swapping out the (in most cases) restrictive factory air intake setup, with its multiple resonator-chambered tubing and low-flow paper filter, and substitute a higher air flow, reuseable air filter, like those offered by K&N, AEM, aFe, Bully Dog, and others. We like the idea of saving money on air filters as well as the promise of more power so we decided to take a closer look. For this scientific endeavor we enlisted our 2009 Motor Trend Truck of the Year long-termer Ford F-150 and asked the tech guys at K&N to give us exact before-and-after dyno numbers. We'd be doing some further road testing on our own.

At this point, it's worth noting that all new truck manufacturers do a pretty good job tuning their engines with equal emphasis on power and quietness. However, with so much attention to reduced interior cabin noise by new vehicle buyers, powertrain engineers work long and hard at getting as much noise reduction from the engine as possible. The results on the intake side of the engine have resulted in numerous, bulb-like chambers typically branch off the main intake runner from the filter box, designed specifically to isolate and cancel various sounds generated by the rushing and sucking air as it channels through the filter and toward the combustion chamber.

2 Factory Paper Filter
2. The factory paper filter... 
   
  read full caption
2 Factory Paper Filter
2. The factory paper filter is as large as a college textbook. Air is sucked from the driver-side fenderwell, through the paper filter, and then drawn into the throttle body. Our filter (changed just 2000 miles ago) is quite dirty, making it difficult for our pickup to get big gulps of air when needed. We would have shelled out about $15 at the local autoparts store for a new one pretty quick.
We found, once the K&N High-Flow Intake kit was installed, the engine noise levels were slightly louder and more pronounced during hard and moderate accelerations; however, idle and cruising speeds showed no noticeable changes. As a side note, our guess is that many enthusiasts may like the more throaty and raspy noise the engine makes when pushed a bit, as it gives the impression there may be more under the hood that one might suspect. We didn't find the throatier sound unpleasant at all, and appreciated the tone difference when we pulled up alongside another '09 F-150.

Additionally, we found a slightly quicker throttle response after installing the kit; we assume a direct result of the reduced restriction and smoothed air running from filter to combustion chamber.


1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next

RELATED PHOTOS

3 Kand N Headquarters Dyno 5 Test Computer
4 Dybo Liquid Filled Cylinders 6 Test Bay

More Related Content

Community Comments

FrankLee  (10/08/09 05:42 PM)

The entire premise of this "article" is flawed. In fact, there is too much wrong with it to itemize and stay within the posting character limit so I'll cut to the chase and say this isn't really an article at all, it is an infomercial for hawking this product and a strikingly poor one at that. Even the product's makers are smart enough not to make claims this ridiculous. If anyone wants the real scoop on fuel economy they can go to www.fueleconomydotgov; there you will find what has been SCIENTIFICALLY tested and proven to work, and what has not.

BobSmalls  (10/09/09 08:24 AM)

I'll itemize it in 1024 charachters or less.

*Driving style affects MPG more than any other factor.

*Should have tested MPG while on the dyno.  Seriously.  That's the only scientifically valid, repeatable way to test the fuel economy impact of a device like this.  Do a few test runs with the factory intake, and a few with the K&N intake kit.  Your results are not scientifically valid unless they are repeatable.

*Variations in driving style, wind, air density and temperature, tire and road surface temperature, etc. create large variations in MPG.  Don't believe me?  Log your MPG for a few days.  You'll see 10% variations all over the place.  Added bonus:  Paying attention to your MPG actually causes it to improve.

*You had dyno time and you blew it.  Hang your head in shame.

*If there was a real opportunity to gain +10% MPG (or even +1% MPG), Ford would not have left it on the table.  This applies to spark plugs, air filters, intake vortex generators, and anything else that doesn't affect styling, etc.

Onebulldogs  (10/11/09 11:01 AM)

Wouldn't it have been more legitimate to let someone besides K&N do the test?

Edward A. Sanchez  (10/12/09 10:03 AM)

@ Onebulldogs. In a perfect world, perhaps. However, K&N is one of the few facilities in Southern California that has a four-wheel dyno, which is required when testing all-wheel-drive vehicles. So even though on the surface it may seem like favoritism or impropriety, it's more often than not a matter of necessity.

FrankLee  (10/13/09 09:43 PM)

:
Edward A. Sanchez  (10/12/09 01:03 PM)

@ Onebulldogs. In a perfect world, perhaps. However, K&N is one of the few facilities in Southern California that has a four-wheel dyno, which is required when testing all-wheel-drive vehicles. So even though on the surface it may seem like favoritism or impropriety, it's more often than not a matter of necessity.




Four-wheel dyno. Right. Look at the picture and tell us where the front wheels are. :rolleyes:

FrankLee  (10/13/09 09:59 PM)

Another thing I'm going to point out is the glaring discrepency between the dyno chart LINES and the dyno chart NUMBERS. The numbers for HP and Torque for "with K&N" have been inflated by 10 each, and the erroneous numbers were used in the calculations- for whatever they are worth, as every number in this piece is suspect. I'm actually surprised Mr. Williams... er, I mean, "By the author" didn't photoshop in his own new dyno lines- but that might have taken some effort.

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)


User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)