Truck Trend Homepage
Truck Trend
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Shooting

Inside Look: 2011 Ford F-150 EcoBoost Testing with Mike Rowe

It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it
October 29, 2010
By Mark Williams
 

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Mike Rowe 2
It's not going to be easy to convince truck buyers that they can have all the power, performance, and durability of a V-8 with just six cylinders, but that's the task in front of Ford with its new 3.5-liter V-6 EcoBoost engine for the new F-150. Maybe you've seen the first installment of Ford's torture test campaign, rolled out as a multipart Internet short-form documentary with the "Dirty Jobs" guy, Mike Rowe, highlighting all the tests Ford put the new engine through in six months. Ford completely revamped the F-150 powertrain lineup by offering four new engines, including a new all-aluminum 3.7-liter DOHC V-6, an all-aluminum 5.0-liter DOHC V-8, an all-new all-aluminum 3.5-liter EcoBoost direct-injection twin turbo DOHC V-6, and the 6.2-liter SOHC V-8 we've already seen in the Raptor and new Super Dutys. This new EcoBoost engine (also used in the SHO Taurus) is Ford's first application of the technology in a pickup truck, offering considerably better fuel economy numbers while holding onto maximum payload and towing numbers for the F-150 frame. It won't be an easy sell for loyal V-8 customers who are accustomed to the strength and durability of their favorite small-block half-tons. To counter their skepticism, Ford marketing gurus (no doubt after consulting with several engineers) have devised a multi-stage torture test worthy of the Marquis de Sade.

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Shooting
The plan goes something like this: Pull an 3.5L EcoBoost off the line at random; run it on a shock-test dyno for the equivalent of 150,000 miles; drop that engine into a 2011 Red Candy Metallic SuperCrew XLT 4x4; send it deep into the Oregon forests to do heavy-duty log pulling; then have it do some more 24-hour torture testing pulling a heavy load at a famous raceway; then take the vehicle back to Davis Dam for some more towing with a few competitors; then finally yank the engine out of the F-150 and put into a competitive desert racetruck to run the Baja 1000. And then engineers will tear it down to see what kind of wear they find. So far, the engine has performed flawlessly, without a single hiccup, but the torture is far from over. In fact, it's quite easy to identify this exact engine's ID number along the way. It's prominently displayed at the front of the right cylinder head as #448AA.

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Camera Crew
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Camera Crew 2
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Camera Setup
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Engine
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Engine Number
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Front End In Motion

1  | 2  | Next

RELATED PHOTOS

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Logging Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Set 2
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Rear End Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Set 1
Recent Articles

More Related Content

Community Comments

nortenodecorazon  (10/31/10 03:08 PM)

if the 5.0 cost less than the ecoboost i wont choose the eco. and then the v8 sounds way better. mpg? 2 mpg difference? who cares, i woul

lasvegascolonel  (11/05/10 04:52 PM)

Ford is trying this same trick with the new Explorer...charging more for the smaller engine.  The 4 cylinder turbo-charged in the Explorer has 50hp less than the standard V6...but cost more.  The highway mileage Ford claims on this is only 1 mile more than Chevy's Silverado with its V8 5.3 with cylinder deactivation.  I'll pass on this one, Ford.

TERBROCK  (11/11/10 12:06 PM)

lasvegascolonel,  As far as I know there are no official fuel economy rating for the 3.5 EcoBoost in the F150 but I have seen estimates as high as 24 mpg highway.  I don't know of any GM truck that gets over 21 mpg.  Looking at the stats on the Chevy on this site it gets 16 mpg highway.  Even if you are right about the 1 mpg difference it don't matter because these 2 engines are not direct competitors.  The 5.3 V8 in the Chevy only puts out 326 HP and 348 lbs/feet of torque at 4400 rpm.  The 3.5 EcoBoost puts out 365 HP and 420 lbs/feet of torque at 2500 rpm.  GM's 6.2 V8 would be a better comparison.

svtklondike67  (01/31/11 07:08 PM)

You said it, terbrock.
Also, if Ford lets some of these engines trickle down to lower models in limited quantities...say the Ranger or Explorer?...

Jobe_Pro  (12/13/11 10:05 AM)

Well I've got a 2011 Loaded Platinum 5.5'box with the extra payload package,3.73 gears(wish it had 3.55,might get better millage),Identical to the test truck specs, its got a little over 5000Km's on it, I'll agree it has the preformance of any V8 and is smooth acceleration, but the 20 city and 30Hwy MPA rating in Canada is farfetched, best combined I can get is about 18, city around 15-16(12-14 now that its winter) and Hwy is a disapointing 16-18, all my previous Ford 5.4's,(97, 99, 02, 05 & 2007) with 3.73's got 18mpa combined city/hwy with out trying, sure they weren't quite as spuncky as this thing but the new 5.0 & 6.2 I'm sure arn't that bad either, so why buy the V6 Ecco if it can't get better milage, that's what they sold me on and I was very sceptical, and should of backed off and got the 6.2, The big concern now is, will it out last a V8, will the Turbos last ... not sure I made the right move on this one.

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)



*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)
Trade In Value