Truck Trend Homepage
Truck Trend
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Shooting

Inside Look: 2011 Ford F-150 EcoBoost Testing with Mike Rowe

 

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Logging
This kind of testing and documentation takes plenty of time and money, and coordinating all this is no doubt a dirty job, but someone has to do it. Thankfully, Ford has no-nonsense truck guy Mike Rowe keeping Erick Kuehn, chief engineer for the F-150, and Marc Lapine, the Ford Truck marketing manager, in line. We were at some of the testing and the filming of a head-to-head torque race where the Ford guys took on their two main rivals. Although we can't give anything away, we can say Ford did everything possible to keep it a fair fight, even though on the face of it, a V-8 vs. V-6 contest doesn't look fair.

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Rear End
That particular episode won't debut for several weeks, but the next installment will happen pretty quickly. Specifically, the Red EcoBoost F-150 was called into duty at the Nygaard Logging Company, used as a skidder to haul harvested timber to a large logging truck. Each log can weight up to four tons and is much too large to be carried. The logs are wrapped with specially designed chains, attached to the F-150 hitch, and dragged more than a mile to the loading areas. In total, the F-150 hauled almost 200,000 pounds of fresh-cut wood for Nygaard before calling it a day.

Our guess is Ford will be pushing these messages in a lot of places to convince half-ton truck guys this engine is a viable choice. And if early indications continue to pan out, that might not be such a hard sell. It would also make sense to plant the EcoBoost engine in the medium and large SUVs, like the Expeditions and Navigators, in order to spread development costs for the engine. It may be a dirty job to try to sell smaller engines to a V-8-loving truck segment, but with more fuel economy regulations on the horizon, somebody's got to do it.

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Set 2
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Set 1
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Mike Rowe

Prev | 1  | 2

RELATED PHOTOS

Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Mike Rowe 2 Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Camera Crew
Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Shooting Ford F 150 Ecoboost Commerical Camera Crew 2
Recent Articles

More Related Content

Community Comments

nortenodecorazon  (10/31/10 03:08 PM)

if the 5.0 cost less than the ecoboost i wont choose the eco. and then the v8 sounds way better. mpg? 2 mpg difference? who cares, i woul

lasvegascolonel  (11/05/10 04:52 PM)

Ford is trying this same trick with the new Explorer...charging more for the smaller engine.  The 4 cylinder turbo-charged in the Explorer has 50hp less than the standard V6...but cost more.  The highway mileage Ford claims on this is only 1 mile more than Chevy's Silverado with its V8 5.3 with cylinder deactivation.  I'll pass on this one, Ford.

TERBROCK  (11/11/10 12:06 PM)

lasvegascolonel,  As far as I know there are no official fuel economy rating for the 3.5 EcoBoost in the F150 but I have seen estimates as high as 24 mpg highway.  I don't know of any GM truck that gets over 21 mpg.  Looking at the stats on the Chevy on this site it gets 16 mpg highway.  Even if you are right about the 1 mpg difference it don't matter because these 2 engines are not direct competitors.  The 5.3 V8 in the Chevy only puts out 326 HP and 348 lbs/feet of torque at 4400 rpm.  The 3.5 EcoBoost puts out 365 HP and 420 lbs/feet of torque at 2500 rpm.  GM's 6.2 V8 would be a better comparison.

svtklondike67  (01/31/11 07:08 PM)

You said it, terbrock.
Also, if Ford lets some of these engines trickle down to lower models in limited quantities...say the Ranger or Explorer?...

Jobe_Pro  (12/13/11 10:05 AM)

Well I've got a 2011 Loaded Platinum 5.5'box with the extra payload package,3.73 gears(wish it had 3.55,might get better millage),Identical to the test truck specs, its got a little over 5000Km's on it, I'll agree it has the preformance of any V8 and is smooth acceleration, but the 20 city and 30Hwy MPA rating in Canada is farfetched, best combined I can get is about 18, city around 15-16(12-14 now that its winter) and Hwy is a disapointing 16-18, all my previous Ford 5.4's,(97, 99, 02, 05 & 2007) with 3.73's got 18mpa combined city/hwy with out trying, sure they weren't quite as spuncky as this thing but the new 5.0 & 6.2 I'm sure arn't that bad either, so why buy the V6 Ecco if it can't get better milage, that's what they sold me on and I was very sceptical, and should of backed off and got the 6.2, The big concern now is, will it out last a V8, will the Turbos last ... not sure I made the right move on this one.

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)



*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)
Trade In Value