Truck Trend Homepage
Truck Trend
2011 Ford F 150 XLT Front View

First Drive: 2011 Ford F-150

 

2011 Ford F 150 V8 Engine
The third concern is durability. Ford has done extensive testing with this engine, and recently announced it's going to promote the EcoBoost's strength with webisodes showing the same engine undergoing the equivalent of 150,000 miles of testing, then getting installed in an F-150 on the production line and being driven up to Oregon, where it will do work at a logging company. After that, the same engine will be put in a race truck and run in the Baja 1000. Even with all of that, it's going to take time before truck buyers can accept a V-6 as being as capable or reliable as a V-8 doing the same amount of work, and we're not sure the engine will be received with open arms by hard-core truck people. Over time, though, they may warm to it. It'll be tough for Ford to change the V-8 versus V-6 perspective.

2011 Ford F 150 V6 Engine
For EcoBoost skeptics, Ford's all-aluminum 5.0-liter V-8 with 360-horsepower and 380-pound-feet -- a version of which first made its debut in the 2011 Mustang -- should do nicely. The 5.0-liter has 40 more horses than the departing 5.4-liter V-8, and it also has Ti-VCT. Throttle response feels much quicker than the outgoing V-8s, and while not quite as fast as the EcoBoost or the 6.2, it has plenty of power for towing up to 10,000 pounds or hauling as much as 3060 pounds of payload. The 5.0-liter is available in the XL, STX, XLT, FX2/FX4, Lariat, King Ranch, and Platinum.

The new base engine for the F-150 line, which comes standard under the hood of the XL, STX, and XLT, is Ford's normally aspirated 3.7-liter V-6 with Ti-VCT, which we've tried out in the 2011 Mustang and Ford Edge Sport, and expect to see expand into other products in the company's lineup over time. It has 302 horsepower and 278 pound-feet of torque in the F-150, which is better than the outgoing two-valve 4.6-liter V-8's 248 horses and 294 pound-feet, although peak horsepower comes at a significantly higher rpm (6500 as opposed to 4750).

The 3.7-liter isn't phenomenally fast, but it is a surprisingly good base engine. That it comes with a six-speed automatic helps. At Ford's event, we had the chance to drive the 3.7 back-to-back against the Chevrolet Silverado with GM's 4.3-liter V-6, an engine that has been around forever and is in more dire need of a replacement than anything that was in the F-150. Not surprisingly, the 3.7-equipped F-150 felt quicker, and the transmission's shifts were better timed to respond to changing conditions, whether on a grade, accelerating, or slowing down. It also did a fine job of holding gears going uphill. There was no significant hunting, which would've been a problem if this were a too-small engine in a too-big vehicle. But it can take some throttle-mashing to get the 3.7-liter to that magic 6500 rpm and 302 horsepower, and towing is limited to 6100 pounds.

2011 Ford F 150 LTD Interior Badge
2011 Ford F 150 XLT Crew Cab Front View Blue
2011 Ford F 150 XLT Front View
2011 Ford F 150 Passengers Towing
2011 Ford F 150 LTD Door Sill
2011 Ford F 150 Front Three Quarters View

Prev | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | Next

2011 Ford F 150 XLT Front View
Click here to see photos for the 2011 Ford F-150 and check out what's new for 2011!
2011 Ford F 150 Lariat Front Passengers Side
The source for official specifications, payload, towing capacity, and other information about the 2011 Ford F-150!

RELATED PHOTOS

2011 Ford F 150 Front 2011 Ford F 150 Testing
2011 Ford F 150 XLT Towing 2011 Ford F 150 SKV Rear View Burnout
Recent Articles

More Related Content

Community Comments

lasvegascolonel  (09/27/10 07:23 PM)

Yes, indeed, people will need to be convinced a V6 will do the job AND hold up.  If it's being stressed, it's life may be shortened.  The other factor is, if a person pays more for this engine...how many tankfuls of gas savings will it take for the engine to pay for itself?  If it's more costly than a V8, even the 5.0L, and it will take years to pay for itself, few people will want to do that, although some people do pay more for more economical vehicles.  Ford is also trying to do this with the new Explorer, charging more for the lower powered 4 cylinder than the more powerful V6.  We'll see if there are many takers.

Thrumcap  (09/28/10 12:47 PM)

Wouldn't it make sense to offer these engine choices in the Expedition?  I have heard nothing about this...

ColoradoRaptor123  (09/28/10 01:37 PM)

Id love to get that Eco Boost in my Raptor.  Its in the rest of the product line...and they are testing in in Baja...WHY NOT!!

nortenodecorazon  (09/28/10 09:48 PM)

too expensive to sale in big numbers. lets see if ford can pull this one out.

aggiewoodie  (09/29/10 11:10 AM)

I'll take the F-150 4x4 King Ranch with the Ecoboost. Everyone is a bit worried about durability- but as little as I drive, and tow, it'll be perfect for 3-5 years, even if it does prove to be less durable in the long run. My gut, though, is that it will be just as strong as any of the other engines. Ford has too much riding on it. I'm wondering what the 0-60 time will be on the EB- TT is thinking 6.7-7.4 for the 6.2L, without much more power or torque.

09G8GT  (03/12/11 05:52 PM)

For the first time in 30 years I am truckless although we do have an '08 Tahoe Hybrid and an '09 HHR besides the '09 Pontiac G8 GT.  The eco boost V6 in a standard cab short bed would make a fine revived Lightning to build on.  I don't see it being used like a real truck, though, more closely it appears to resemble the usefulness and effectiveness of a Ridgeline.  It could be a nice quick little hot-shot truck for delivery companies.

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)



*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)
Trade In Value