Truck Trend Homepage
Truck Trend
2012 Ford Ranger Front View Static

First Look: 2012 Ford Ranger

90 Percent of an F-150, 100 Percent Not Coming Here
October 27, 2010
By Benson Kong
 

2012 Ford Ranger Side View Passenger
You'd be forgiven for mistaking the present U.S. market Ford Ranger for one from the Ronald Reagan era -- which is exactly why the new global version has truck fans crying foul over Ford's decision not to bring the all-new Ranger here.

In a segment accustomed to lengthy product cycles, any major introduction is cause for huzzahs and scrutiny. The 2012 Ranger, designated T6, has sheetmetal completely unlike its predecessor. The smoothed-out, modern exterior styling would undoubtedly be alien in our market, where sharp and boxy designs dominate before they even reach the drawing boards. Ford's contemporary three-bar grille and front fender decoration give the Ranger a distinct presence. It has grown to about 90 percent of the F-150's size, effectively throwing this truck into the midsize classification. In fact, the new Ranger's size is essentially the main reason why Ford has decided not to bring it here.

2012 Ford Ranger Front Three Quarters Passenger
Inside, the Ranger will accommodate the working crew with a hose-down interior. Lifestyle drivers are presented with more upscale appointments, but all seats, panels, and materials have undergone rigorous testing to ensure durability, according to Ford.

2012 Ford Ranger Side Vent
New engines lack the sheer power ratings and cylinder counts of the 2011 F-150 V-6 and V-8 offerings but serve up some grunt of their own. The base engine is a 2.5-liter Duratec inline-four putting out 164 horsepower and capable of running pure ethanol (E100). Two small diesels, another concept foreign in the U.S. truck market, will be available via either a 2.2-liter four-cylinder (148 horsepower, 277 pound-feet of torque) or 3.2-liter straight-five (197 horsepower, 347 pound-feet). Trucks are among the few reliable vehicle classes for those in search of a manual transmission, and the global Ranger has both a five- and six-speed boxes alongside a six-speed automatic.

2012 Ford Ranger Front View Static
2012 Ford Ranger Rear Three Quarters
2012 Ford Ranger Badge
2012 Ford Ranger Front Three Quarters Static Passenger
2012 Ford Ranger Rear Three Quarters Static
2012 Ford Ranger Rear Three Quarters Static Driver

1  | 2  | Next

2012 Ford Ranger Front
After nearly three decades, the Ford Ranger is set for elimination in the United States
2012 Ford Ranger Rear Three Quarters Static
Click here to see photos for the all-new Global Ford Ranger (non U.S.) and check out what's new!

RELATED PHOTOS

2012 Ford Ranger Headlight 2012 Ford Ranger Engine 3
2012 Ford Ranger Grille 2012 Ford Ranger Engine 2
Recent Articles

More Related Content

Community Comments

lasvegascolonel  (10/16/10 07:55 PM)

Though this looks like a fairly large mid-sized truck, it is a shame that Ford, along with GM and Chrysler, are ignoring the American market for this segment by deciding to do away with these vehicles. Not everyone needs a large work-sized truck.  I guess the Americans who need a reasonably sized truck will have to buy them from Toyota, Nissan, Honda, etc.  Of course, many of the Japanese trucks are made in the U.S., so American workers can benefit.

avionicsman  (10/17/10 04:56 AM)

I'm 100% not going to buy an F-150 or other full-size. I'd rather keep my old very easy to work on 4 cyl truck. I'd rather buy the but ugly Mahindra turbo diesel if it starts selling. I'd rather buy something that fits it my garage in all 3 dimensions. I need a license plate frame that says: I'd rather not buy big Fords.

A small few will go full-size but the majority will flee to those who sell something less than full-size.

DHedges61  (10/17/10 02:22 PM)

I think it's a mistake that the US would just abandon the Ford Ranger all together and I've owned two Ford Rangers the first one is a 1986 which I finally got rid of on 12/29/98 after I put in 218,000 miles on it and my second one is a 1999 and it's got almost 150,000 and still going strong and I'm not getting rid of it anytime soon.

It's too bad that Ford in the US has decided to replace the Ranger with the F-150 and a 3.7 liter V-6 that gets about 16 city and 23 hwy come on my 1999 Ford Ranger isn't as powerful but the 3.0 liter V-6 gets much better gas milage than the 3.7 liter V-6 F-150 and that's a joke.

tacocollins  (10/22/10 11:40 AM)

In 2009,I needed to replace my 95 Ford Taurus.Wanted a small truck with great mileage,looks and quality.Looked at Ford Ranger,but even in 2009 Rangers outside North America were stylish,well equiped etc.Ford North America already had plans to discontinue the Ranger around 2011 or so.Why-because Tacoma already overtook them in USA years ago with great styling, features and quality.Ford lost another customer.My Tacoma should be around 15 to 20 yrs. Ford should understand customers demand better trucks, and not just better cars

vrooom2906  (11/04/11 10:28 PM)

Reality is - Your american built trucks are just crap! any where outside the US. - Oversize bemomeths of rubbish, ride like boats, unreliable and build quality bettered by LEGO! Bloody thirsty to run too! Australia has tried Chev and Fords for Ambualces and emergency vehicles - but none prove reliable enough to dependon. Rediculously wide cabs for fat arsed yanks and acres of crappy chrome moulded plastic! Tell what crap american cars do sell, anywher else!

jessallen  (01/01/12 05:50 PM)

i would like get new ford ranger 4 doors in U.S

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)



*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)
Trade In Value