Truck Trend Homepage
Truck Trend
Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Front End

Comparison: Ford F-150 XLT vs Chevy Silverado LT vs Ram 1500 SLT

Ford EcoBoost has plenty to prove on the Davis Dam grade
December 17, 2010
By Mark Williams
 

Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Camera Crew
The Davis Dam grade in Nevada is where all of the major truck OEs come to make their trucks cry -- it's been where the majority of serious pickup truck trailer testing has been done for decades. Temperatures in this part of the desert just above Laughlin, Nevada, are usually in the triple digits. Add to that a nasty climb out of the valley for several miles and you can see how this might be a problem for an engine and transmission (not to mention a cooling system) pulling a heavy load. For many truck drivers, this is the kind situation to avoid at all costs. For Ford, in desperate need of proving the strength and durability of its new EcoBoost engine, this is where it needs to be to challenge the competition.

Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Camera Crew 2
For those who haven't been following Ford's EcoBoost marketing plan, Ford pulled a random 3.5L V-6 EcoBoost engine off the line (#448AA), did some dyno testing (for an equivalent of 150,000 miles), then mounted it into a SuperCrew XLT for some towing (11,000 pounds for 24 hours around a NASCAR track) and hauling (26 tons of logs at an Oregon tree mill) and racing (the Baja 1000) situations. But none of those tests pitted the new engine against any of its competitors, like in this Davis Dam grade test. The testing was conducting by a third-party test crew, running a Ford F-150 SuperCrew EcoBoost against a Chevy Crew Cab Silverado 5.3L V-8 and a Ram 1500 Quad Cab 5.7L V-8. All three pulled identically equipped and weighted trailers in two different types of runs-0-60 mph from the start line, as well as a 3.5-mile full run up the course. At the same time, Ford pitchman Mike Rowe had some on-camera time with the lead F-150 engineer, Eric Keuhn, to talk about the F-150 and EcoBoost powertrains. Here's what we saw.

2011 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew Cab Front View
2011 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew Cab Rear View
2011 Ford F150 Front Three Quarter
Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Crew
Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Cockpit
Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Engine

1  | 2  | 3  | Next

RELATED PHOTOS

Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Side Rear Mirror Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Ecoboost Number
Ford F 150 XLT Chevy Silverado LT Ram 1500 SLT Front End 2011 Ram 1500 Front Three Quarters Static
Recent Articles

More Related Content

Community Comments


leff82  (12/14/10 12:29 PM)

I agree it would have been nice to see the Silverado with the 3.73 rear end, however true to what the coordinater said I looked it up on the Chevy website and you can't get a 5.3L Crew Cab 4x4 with anything lower than a 3.42 rear end.  Even with the 3.73's the torque deficit is pretty big between the 5.3 and the Ecoboost.  I'm more impressed with the fact that it held it's own against the Hemi in the Ram, even though the tranny gearing was a little different and 5 spd vs 6 spd the Ram had a lower 3.92 rear advantage. It would have been nice to see the Tundra 5.7 and heck even the Titan 5.6 in the mix too.

paul42  (12/16/10 01:02 PM)

I find the comparison to the Chevy 5.3 interesting, but I'd also like to see a comparison to the GM 6.2L.  I think these two motors are likely to be cross shopped as much or more than the 5.3 and eco-boost.

I do have to say I'm a bit surprised that the eco-boost times were not better vs the Hemi considering its torque curve and extra gear.

lasvegascolonel  (12/18/10 12:09 PM)

Even without a more advantageous axle for the Chevy, the EcoBoost certainly was impressive.  I would only add three things:  One, how will a V6 pulling a heavy vehicle hold up long-term over a V8?  Two,do you want to pay $5K more for the Ford over the Chevy to get a bit more performance and a bit better gas mileage? Three, if ride comfort is of paramount to you and your family, the Ram still rides the best with its superior suspension.

svtklondike67  (01/05/11 07:09 PM)

I guess Chevy and Dodge didn't have any comparable V6 to run in the test?

vFeralLynXv  (01/27/11 04:49 PM)

@paul42

Well the reason they tested the 5.3L is because the the EcoBoost is not the most powerfull engine option in the F-150, as they do have a 6.2L as well.

Anyway, It was a good test, and all 3 are great trucks

I'd love to know how they got that much torque out of that EcoBoost, wow.

  (03/26/11 06:18 AM)

Well lets see about this test. They picked a 5.3 chevy and based on the hp and torgue don't even compare to the f150. lol  Second why not compare it to the chevy 6.2 and the Tundra, duh it would not have won that battle is why.  All about advertising but i do appluad Ford on making the ecoboost. I think its a great truck way better than the previous models which they should have included inthe test also.

Truck Trend  (03/28/11 06:49 AM)

:::facePlam::

cadet58j  (10/09/11 05:33 AM)

The 5.0 liter in the F150 out performs the competition's similar sized v8s in hp and torque too.  The Hemi to the ecoboost?  Should have been the 4.7 to the 3.5 ecoboost or 5.0. Ford's standard 3.7 v6 would stand up to the Dodge 4.7.
And then there's the Ford 6.2l.  I'd say Ford blows the competition away.

cadet58j  (10/09/11 05:50 AM)

"Second why not compare it to the chevy 6.2 and the Tundra, duh it would not have won the battle is why."
That wouldn't have been a fair comparison is why. To judge engines in performance the fair way is to compare engine displacement/size. Ford does more with less...that's the point being made.  
For a fair comparison of the engines you mentioned we need to bring out the Ford 6.2, which has more hp and torque than the Chevy 6.2 or Tundra...duh. Additionally, the Ford 5.0 would have competed here and it is positioned under the ecoboost in Fords engine line up.

NoelGzz  (04/07/12 11:08 AM)

ford sucks...I don't know how they do these tests, but the ones ive tried are too slow and sloppy...chevy rules

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)



*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)
Trade In Value