Truck Trend Homepage
Get Adobe Flash player
APPAREL, GIFTS & MORE!
Full Size Suv Comparison Suvs Front View

Full-size SUV Comparison: 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2008 Ford Expedition vs. 2008 Nissan Armada vs. 2008 Toyota Sequoia

Snow Mobiles: Which Full-Size Sport/Ute Is the Best of the Bigs?
By Ron Kiino
Photography by Brian Vance

With the price of crude oil hovering around $100 per barrel, certain auto analysts are once again questioning the existence of the large SUV. And why not? Not everyone understands these big rigs, some of which can haul eight passengers and tow 10,000 pounds, that tout large-displacement, heavy-hauling V-s but tends to degenerate on-road motions. Add in steering that was judged too light and not particularly communicative--a "Twirl-O-Matic" feel, according to St. Antoine--and the Chevy's chassis was downgraded further. Per Truck Trend editor Mark Williams, "It's the most fun to take to the backcountry and romp around in, but next to these other family-friendly haulers, it just doesn't keep up."

Full Size Suv Comparison Suvs In Line

Further, by eliminating the possibility of a flat floor, the live axle compromises interior efficiency, forcing Chevy to utilize removable third-row seats rather than fold-flat units like the others. Not only is it burdensome to take out those heavy seats, but it's also a burden to sit in them, as they offer the least legroom, 12.3 inches less than that of the Expedition. And if you need to tote gear with a full passenger load, the Tahoe trails again, offering only 16.9 cubic feet behind the third row. And our tester didn't come equipped with the power-operated fold-and-tumble second row, a useful feature included with LTZ Tahoes.

Full Size Suv Comparison Suvs Front View

Of course, it's not like the Chevy is without merits. Despite the Z71 off-road suspension package, the Tahoe provided an impressively compliant highway ride as well as a surprisingly hushed cockpit, even at near-triple-digit speeds. Moreover, the interior, while comparatively Spartan and monotone, did offer the comfiest front bucket seats and the most front headroom. Plus, with Active Fuel Management that switches between V-8 and V-4 power, the Tahoe, at 13.4 mpg, tied with the Toyota for best-in-test fuel economy.

If you're looking for a solid off-road toy that's still laudable on-road, or a cavernous five-seat sport/ute that can swallow seven in a pinch, the Tahoe won't disappoint. But if you're looking for more from a three-row full-size SUV, like a higher tow rating than 8200 pounds, there are better options.

Full Size Suv Comparison Suvs Front View
Full Size Suv Comparison Suvs Front View




1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | 7  | Next

Download your favorite desktop wallpaper of the 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe, 2008 Ford Expedition, 2008 Nissan Armada, and 2008 Toyota Sequoia here!

RELATED PHOTOS

Full Size Suv Comparison Chevy Tahoe LT Rear View Full Size Suv Comparison Chevy Tahoe LT Engine
Full Size Suv Comparison Chevy Tahoe LT Interior Full Size Suv Comparison Chevy Tahoe LT Side View

More Related Content

Community Comments

No one has commented on this article yet. Why not be the first to leave a comment?

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)


User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)