Truck Trend Homepage
Get Adobe Flash player
APPAREL, GIFTS & MORE!
2009 Subaru Forester Xt Side Motion View

Crossover Comparison: 2008 Mazda CX-7 vs 2009 Subaru Forester XT vs 2009 Volkswagen Tiguan

2009 Subaru Forester Xt Front Three Quarter Motion View

Over the Rainbow

The Forester, whose $28,860 "XT Limited" badge is slightly dearer than that of the Mazda, brings to the party leather trim, automatic climate control, panoramic sunroof, 10-way power driver's seat, 17-inch alloys, and a 224-horse turbocharged flat-4, but it lacks some of the others' premium features, notably Xenon headlamps, CD changer, and backup camera. Still, our nicely equipped tester, boasting one option-an $1800 navigation package with six-speaker stereo and Audyssey MultiEQ enhancement-wears a best-in-test price tag of $30,660.

2009 Subaru Forester Xt Side Motion View

Speaking of best in test, the Subaru claims most of those titles-over twice as many as the Mazda and nearly four times those of the Volkswagen. It's the quickest to 60 (6.6 seconds) and the quarter mile (15.1 at 89.0 mph), yet it sips the fewest gallons of petrol, both for EPA (19 mpg city/24 mpg hwy) and observed fuel economy (19.6 mpg), even with a four-speed automatic. It weighs the fewest pounds (3423) yet it tows the most (2400). It provides the most front headroom (40.0 inches), the most ground clearance (8.9 inches), and the highest approach and departure angles (24.8/24.8 degrees). Need to transport tall passengers in the rear seat? Help your friend move? The Forester affords the most rear legroom (38.0 inches)-as well as front legroom (43.1)-and the biggest cargo area, whether the back seat is up (30.8 cubic feet) or down (63.0).

2009 Subaru Forester Xt Front View

"You have to be impressed with what you get for the money," says St. Antoine, "a lot of convenience, room, and capability for the bucks." Loh concurs: "The Forester is an impressive feat of performance and packaging." Not that it's perfect, mind you, as it's sometimes overmatched in details and refinement. The steering feels artificial and vague against the others. The softer suspension equals a wealth of body roll, although the ride is markedly plush and the figure-eight time (28.1 seconds) is as quick as the others' but at higher lateral grip (0.60 g average). The interior is a WRX rip-off and not as posh as the VW's nor as chic as the Mazda's. And the exterior styling is the least stunning or innovative of the three, a quasi-combination of Mitsubishi Outlander and Honda Pilot.

2009 Subaru Forester Xt Rear Three Quarter View

Nonetheless, this Subie never ceases to amaze. It costs over three grand less than the CX-7 and nearly eight thousand less than the Tiguan, yet it's quicker, roomier, more fuel-miserly, and more off-road-capable. More for less. That's the kind of formula that wins comparison tests.

1st place: 2009 Subaru Forester XT Limited
Quick, roomy, fuel-efficient, and well-priced, the Forester checks just about every box-most important, the one for first place.

2nd place: 2008 Mazda CX-7 Grand Touring AWD
Striking lines, sublime steering, and athletic chassis make this the driver's choice. Subpar fuel economy and hefty curb weight make it our second choice.

3rd place: 2009 Volkswagen Tiguan SEL 4Motion
Cute, refined, and feature-laden, the Tiguan is a winner. Were it five grand less, it might've been this test's winner.

2009 Subaru Forester Xt Interior
2009 Subaru Forester Xt Engine

Prev | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next

RELATED PHOTOS

Turbo Crossover Comparison Mazda Cx 7 Volkswagen Tiguan Subaru Forester Turbo Crossover Comparison Mazda Cx 7 Volkswagen Tiguan Subaru Forester
Turbo Crossover Comparison Mazda Cx 7 Volkswagen Tiguan Subaru Forester Turbo Crossover Comparison Mazda Cx 7 Volkswagen Tiguan Subaru Forester

More Related Content

Community Comments

No one has commented on this article yet. Why not be the first to leave a comment?

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)


User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)