Truck Trend Homepage
Get Adobe Flash player
APPAREL, GIFTS & MORE!
2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Rear Three Quarters View

Diesel and Hybrid SUV Comparison: 2009 BMW X5 xDrive 35d vs 2010 Lexus RX 450h vs 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML320 BlueTEC vs 2009 Volkswagen Touareg TDI

2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Front Three Quarters View
Midpack performance, low-key... 
   
  read full caption
2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Front Three Quarters View
Midpack performance, low-key styling make the ML a solid but forgettable drive. Comand needs an overhaul.

Halfway through our journey back home, Williams calls over the radio, "Guys, the Lexus is showing 36 miles to empty." Our plan has been to stop nearly 200 miles farther down the road, but we have to pull over, even though all the diesels show half-filled tanks and remaining ranges approaching 300 miles. As the pumps click off gallons and dollars, our head-scratching begins.

To no one's surprise, the hybrid Lexus bests all in real-world fuel economy. At 23.0 mpg, the RX 450h beats its next closest rival, the surprisingly efficient X5, by 1 mpg. Bringing up the rear is the Touareg, which is 2.5 mpg down on the Lexus. Easy call, then? No, because mpg is only one way of looking at this equation.

2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Rear Three Quarters View

Dollars is another, and the difference in fuel costs between the Lexus and the Volkswagen over our 600-mile journey came out to only $10.17. Sound like a lot? Factor in what you get for that extra 10 bucks: 407 pound-feet of torque and the ability to haul over 7700 pounds-more than twice that of the Lexus. Was this a capability we exploited on this trip? No, but it's certainly food for thought for anyone who expects an SUV to tow a boat or boatloads of gear.

2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Front View

Then there's the range factor. With only 19.2 gallons onboard, the RX 450h's fuel sipping strategy is effectively negated when matched up against the diesels' large tanks. Using the EPA highway numbers, the Touareg could theoretically cover 660 miles on its 26.2-gallon tank. Our real-world mileage ended up significantly lower, but our calculations still suggested the VW could go approximately 100 miles farther on a fill-up than the Lexus (442 versus 542 miles-the longest range of the group).

The caveat is fluctuating fuel prices. At our first stop, diesel cost 20 cents more than premium unleaded. At our second stop, the prices were the same. As of this writing, this 20 cent spread is substantiated by the Department of Energy's list of state fuel cost averages (www.eia.doe.gov). Unfortunately for diesel lovers, California's narrow range isn't reflected across the country. In some regions, gas stations charge between 40 cents to 80 cents less for unleaded, which could definitely be a diesel deal breaker.

2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Interior View

At decision time, both the Mercedes-Benz and BMW seem to slip by the wayside. Though the X5 xDrive 35d delivers the best diesel fuel economy and an exhilarating drive, it also shows glaring incongruities. Those sticky Michelins that felt so grippy on the street prove useless off-road, as does BMW's clearly street-tuned all-wheel-drive system. We managed to get our X5 stuck three times, which is three more times than either the Lexus or VW became mired. We expect more utility from a luxury SUV-especially one that costs $65,000. "Bags of fun to drive in the dry, and I really dig the motor, but the cockpit leaves me cold, the lack of off-road prowess gives me pause, and the pricetag induces heart palpitations," says St. Antoine.

2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Buttons
2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Control Display


2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Trunk Space
2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Engine


2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Engine
2009 Mercedes Benz ML320 Bluetec Cruise Control Stalk



Prev | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next

BlueTEC Diesel Moves ML in More Fuel Efficient Direction - Mercedes-Benz and diesels go together like bratwursts and warm beer - the automaker claims to have built the first ever diesel-powered passenger car.
With all the buzz about climbing fuel prices, and how current buyers are looking for new ways to increase their efficiency, it looks like Mercedes-Benz may have found a way to give its SUV buyers the best of both worlds.

RELATED PHOTOS

Diesel SUV Comparison Front View Diesel Hybrid Suvs Rear Three Quarter
Diesel Hybrid Suvs Front Diesel SUV Comparison Front View

More Related Content

Community Comments

Edward A. Sanchez  (03/05/09 10:13 AM)

I'm a big fan of diesels in general, but I think they especially make sense for light trucks and SUVs. I'm frankly surprised why we haven't seen more diesel SUVs pop up in the past year or so. I think "hybrid" has become such a buzzword, that people think they want it without truly understanding how the technology works, and what its limitations are.

rich73  (03/22/09 09:30 AM)

I am (for my wife) currently in the market for these type of vehicles and with this comparison, I am more confused.  I was leaning on the BMW X5 35d but it came last place? I know the price is steep (with boxes ticked off) which is my biggest issue.   The Touareg will now be something we really need to look into.   Still not ready for the hybrid thing due to long term reliability, which then questions the Touareg which is rated as per Consumer Reports report as "has consistently been well below average."  

I am leaning towards the FX35 currently for it's sporty attributes.   Less cargo room, but I've got a TRD Tacoma which will take care of those issue (most of the time).

My wife really likes the X5 or MDX.

The search continues.

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)


User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)