Truck Trend Homepage
Truck Trend
2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige Front 3Q View

First Drive: 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Expanding the Range: Something new from the Go-Everywhere Gang
May 27, 2011
By Frank Markus
 

Land Rover's crystal-ball department reckons the global lux 'ute market is going to expand by 35 percent over the next five years, and it wants a big bite of this widening slice of profit pie. How best to get it? Expand the Range Rover brand while shrinking its footprint, both physically and environmentally.

2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige Side Profile
This could have been accomplished lickety-split and on the Tata-Nano cheap by pounding the LR2's sheetmetal into the shape of the similarly compact LRX concept vehicle, but thankfully, that's not how the new Indian parent company rolls. No, the LRX is being developed into the Range Rover Evoque the hard way--by reimagining every detail to perform in a way that befits its bucks-up branding, while remaining faithful to the popular concept car's initial design and packaging.

2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige Rear Three Q
First, the basics: The Evoque will be available in the U.S. as a two- or four-door, with the two-door seating four or five passengers. In place of the LR2's Volvo-designed 230-horsepower, 234-pound-foot I-6 is a Ford-built 2.0-liter turbocharged direct-injected engine good for 237 horses and 251 pound-feet. (It was developed alongside the Explorer's EcoBoost mill.) Power flows to the ground through a six-speed automatic transaxle and a standard Haldex Gen-IV all-wheel-drive system. Other markets will get the option of a 2.2-liter diesel that can be teamed with a manual transmission, auto start/stop technology, and front-wheel drive for max fuel economy.

2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige Front 3Q View
The Evoque's architecture is loosely based on the LR2's Ford EUCD platform (Volvo S60/S80), but only a few floorpan and front crash-rail stampings are common in the bodywork, and the upper rear strut mounts are the only common chassis bits. The wheelbase is 0.1 inch shorter, while the bodywork shrinks 5.1-5.5 inches in length and 4.1-5.3 inches in height. (Width grows by 2.3 inches.) An aluminum hood, plastic fenders and tailgate, and extensive use of boron and other high-strength steel alloys help shave 128 pounds out of the bodywork. Figure in aluminum suspension knuckles, a magnesium dash-support beam, and the smaller engine, and the Evoque weighs in about 600 pounds lighter than the 3.2-liter I-6 LR2. Extensive aero tuning lowers the drag coefficient to 0.35, while the frontal area shrinks by 4.7 square feet -- all of which, along with electric steering assist, a smart-charging alternator, a transmission that shifts to a virtual neutral at idle, and low-rolling-resistance tires should make this the least thirsty Land Rover product ever, by a long shot.

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Five Door Prestige Front Three Quar
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Five Door Prestige Rear Three Quart
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Five Door Prestige Side
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Five Door Dynamic Side
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Five Door Dynamic Rear
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Five Door Dynamic Top
2012 Range Rover Evoque Dynamic Verve Interior
2012 Range Rover Evoque Dynamic Energy Interior
2012 Range Rover Evoque Dynamic Pursuit Interior

1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | Next

RELATED PHOTOS

2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige Rear View 2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige Front Drivers Side Three Quarters In Motion
2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige Interior 2012 Range Rover Evoque Prestige 3Q In Motion
Recent Articles

More Related Content

Community Comments

lasvegascolonel  (05/16/11 05:27 PM)

Couldn't they do a better job of disguising its Ford Explorer heritage?  I know Ford owned them when this was being designed, but they should have gone out of their way not to design the Explorer in this vehicle.

Rameni1775  (05/18/11 06:33 AM)

Maybe the technical specs should reflect the Range Rover instead of an American pickup truck.  This makes your website look quite unprofessional.  Poor attention to detail and it detracts from the substance of the article.

Post a Comment (Must Be Registered)



*Please enter your username

*Please enter your password

*Please enter your comments
User Name
Not Registered? Signup Here
Password
Comment
   (1024 character limit)
Trade In Value